Mouth opening frequency of salmon from underwater video exploiting computer vision ↗
C. Schellewald, A. Saad, and A. Stahl · IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2024
cAIge · NFR 344022
From self-learning welfare indicators in underwater video to individual re-identification, long-term AI reasoning, methodological validation, and biological confirmation.
Unsupervised machine learning for salmon status analysis in aquaculture
Develop self-learning methods that extract welfare-relevant information and meaningful salmon anatomy from largely unlabelled underwater video.
How can self-learning algorithms detect welfare indicators and learn high-level salmon features from large volumes of unlabelled video?
Annotation-efficient methods that quantify appearance-based welfare indicators, identify potential rare welfare issues as outliers, and provide fish-part and behaviour information to WP2 and WP3.
C. Schellewald, A. Saad, and A. Stahl · IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2024
T. Fjorden, E. B. Høgstedt, C. Schellewald, R. Mester, M. Remen, A. V. Nytrø, and A. Stahl · ICMV 2024 proceedings, published 2025
E. U. Høgstedt, C. Schellewald, A. Stahl, and R. Mester · ICCV Workshops, 2025
Visual biometrical features for salmon re-identification and long-term monitoring
Design or learn highly discriminative visual biometric features that allow individual salmon to be identified repeatedly in very large commercial populations.
How can advanced visual biometric features enable robust one-to-many re-identification in populations that may contain up to 200,000 salmon?
Highly accurate, long-term identity descriptors and a continuously updated health record for each observed fish, linking repeated visual observations across time.
E. B. Høgstedt, C. Schellewald, R. Mester, and A. Stahl · Aquaculture, 2025
E. U. Høgstedt, C. Schellewald, A. Stahl, and R. Mester · Accepted for IEEE ICIP, 2026 · arXiv:2605.18038
Associate observations with population welfare, environment, and operations
Connect individual observations over time with population welfare, environmental measurements, historical data, and aquaculture operations.
How can heterogeneous welfare observations and contextual data be represented and reasoned over to improve understanding of fish welfare over time?
Models that reveal relationships among welfare observations, operational factors, and environmental conditions, providing a structured basis for interpretation and future decision support. The published WP3 study demonstrates this through an integrated domain representation, inference rules, a fish-welfare journal, and a predictive example.
O. Nissen and A. Saad · Procedia Computer Science, 2024
Methodological validation and biological confirmation
Evaluate the methods from WP1–WP3 under realistic conditions and seek biological confirmation that the detected welfare indicators are relevant and useful.
How well do the proposed methods perform under realistic conditions, and are their outputs meaningful for interpreting fish welfare?
Evidence of technical performance, robustness, and practical usefulness, supported where possible by biological expertise confirming that the detected welfare indicators are meaningful.